I'm not sure I follow. The age adjusted rates represent the rates in that specific age group as do the total cases estimated for 2022. I just did the math to determine the the 2022 rate based on the population in that age group (as they did). Everything in this section is just in regard to that age group. I do have a mistake though that they mention 15 to 39 but I used 18 to 39, so that will inflate my rate. I will fix that by adding the 15 to 17 population as soon as I get a chance. Thank you again for taking a look at this!
I find your post to be very interesting. So please do not take my comments as something negative -- I want to make sure every number is defensible.
you have a typo "steve hirsch"
I do not understand logic and calculations of this paragraph:
Based on population figures here, I am able to determine that the 18-39yo age group represents 29.52% of the US population or about 97.5 million people. That gives us a projected 2022 rate of new cancers in this age group of (87,050/925) 89.28 for 2022. Again, this is a 21% increase in cancers that have been very stable (ranging from 62 to 76) over the last 28 years. I’m not going to photoshop another chart but you get the drift. This is unheard of.
I think that you have something real here. If I write about it I will definitely refer to you in a big rectangle link
Thanks Igor for taking a look, and I appreciate the comments and will look into your questions and tighten it up sometime this weekend. I would love for you to dig into this with your skills and see if you draw similar conclusions. I think this will be everywhere in a few months; it will not be able to be hidden much longer. Thousands of people like me will have similar real world experiences and will be digging for answers. Plus they can't leave 2021 and 2022 off the charts forever. note: 12 months later and still no 2021 data
https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/pancreas.html projects pancreatic cancer rates of 64,050 in 2023. This is compared to data from https://wonder.cdc.gov/cancer-v2020.HTML that shows rates from 2016-2020 of roughly 50,000 to 56,000, with the most recent data (2020) being 52,747. Government projections show more than a 21% increase in just pancreatic cancers since pre-vaccines. 2021-2023 data is missing/not available. They are running out of time to figure out how to spin this, you cannot hold this data forever.
cancer is another version of the virus ideology. this time the cells are the virus and they spread rapidly infecting other cells. atleast that is what people are told. in reality it is damaged cells and it is the toxicity that can spread and cause more damaged cells. toxicity from for example treatments. the doctors might say there is no hope and give 'paleative care' which adds more toxicity. maybe this paleative care was fast tracked inline with the liverpool care pathway as a result of the alleged pandemic.
the test might have been altered to increase the rate.
steve jobs is an example of a pancreatic death often cited by protein pushers. Dr Mc Dougall did this video about steve jobs death saying he was pushed into eating meat in the end etc. maybe the keto craze pushed by e.g. mecola has increased deaths. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81xnvgOlHaY
Dr Morse has some videos on cancer. he says chemo is attempted murder.
cancer society etc. are front groups for animal agriculture/ pharma etc. that would explain why they are covering up increased deaths. what the health showed an example of this. https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x5vfq54
Also I do not understand how SEER calculates "age-adjusted death rate per 100,000"
Sadly we have "age-adjusted rates" up to 2019 and "cases" in 2022, this may present a problem as this is not apples to apples?
Any idea how to overcome it?
I'm not sure I follow. The age adjusted rates represent the rates in that specific age group as do the total cases estimated for 2022. I just did the math to determine the the 2022 rate based on the population in that age group (as they did). Everything in this section is just in regard to that age group. I do have a mistake though that they mention 15 to 39 but I used 18 to 39, so that will inflate my rate. I will fix that by adding the 15 to 17 population as soon as I get a chance. Thank you again for taking a look at this!
I keep a chrome window with a bunch of tabs from SEER and your substack post, I will get a closer look hopefully
I find your post to be very interesting. So please do not take my comments as something negative -- I want to make sure every number is defensible.
you have a typo "steve hirsch"
I do not understand logic and calculations of this paragraph:
Based on population figures here, I am able to determine that the 18-39yo age group represents 29.52% of the US population or about 97.5 million people. That gives us a projected 2022 rate of new cancers in this age group of (87,050/925) 89.28 for 2022. Again, this is a 21% increase in cancers that have been very stable (ranging from 62 to 76) over the last 28 years. I’m not going to photoshop another chart but you get the drift. This is unheard of.
I think that you have something real here. If I write about it I will definitely refer to you in a big rectangle link
Thanks Igor for taking a look, and I appreciate the comments and will look into your questions and tighten it up sometime this weekend. I would love for you to dig into this with your skills and see if you draw similar conclusions. I think this will be everywhere in a few months; it will not be able to be hidden much longer. Thousands of people like me will have similar real world experiences and will be digging for answers. Plus they can't leave 2021 and 2022 off the charts forever. note: 12 months later and still no 2021 data
Also please check my other comment. How do you deal with "age adjusted rates" vs "rates per total population"?
Update:
https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/pancreas.html projects pancreatic cancer rates of 64,050 in 2023. This is compared to data from https://wonder.cdc.gov/cancer-v2020.HTML that shows rates from 2016-2020 of roughly 50,000 to 56,000, with the most recent data (2020) being 52,747. Government projections show more than a 21% increase in just pancreatic cancers since pre-vaccines. 2021-2023 data is missing/not available. They are running out of time to figure out how to spin this, you cannot hold this data forever.
cancer is another version of the virus ideology. this time the cells are the virus and they spread rapidly infecting other cells. atleast that is what people are told. in reality it is damaged cells and it is the toxicity that can spread and cause more damaged cells. toxicity from for example treatments. the doctors might say there is no hope and give 'paleative care' which adds more toxicity. maybe this paleative care was fast tracked inline with the liverpool care pathway as a result of the alleged pandemic.
https://expose-news.com/2021/06/05/the-liverpool-care-pathway-weneedtotalkaboutmidazolam/
the test might have been altered to increase the rate.
steve jobs is an example of a pancreatic death often cited by protein pushers. Dr Mc Dougall did this video about steve jobs death saying he was pushed into eating meat in the end etc. maybe the keto craze pushed by e.g. mecola has increased deaths. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81xnvgOlHaY
Dr Morse has some videos on cancer. he says chemo is attempted murder.
https://drmorse.tv/video/questions-answers-630/
cancer society etc. are front groups for animal agriculture/ pharma etc. that would explain why they are covering up increased deaths. what the health showed an example of this. https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x5vfq54